|
Five reasons to oppose five-day delivery
1. It’s penny-wise and pound-foolish. Saturday delivery is the Postal Service’s key strategic advantage over its private competitors, UPS and FedEx. Giving away our most important comparative advantage in the one area of the postal market that is likely to grow when the economy recovers—e-commerce package delivery—would be very risky. Over time, the loss of revenue would outweigh the short-term savings.
2. It will drive customers away. Slower service—letters mailed on Friday nights would not be picked up until Monday morning or Monday afternoon—and less frequent delivery is likely to accelerate the shift to electronic invoicing and electronic bill paying. Booming businesses like mail order prescriptions would be threatened. Reduced service would also threaten one of the fastest growing segments of the mail—Parcel Select—as UPS, FedEx and other consolidators would reconsider their use of last-mile delivery services by USPS letter carriers.
3. It would prompt the emergence of new competitors. If the Postal Service doesn’t deliver on Saturdays, other companies will step in to fill the void. Within days of the Postal Service’s March 2 announcement, multiple press accounts quoted executives from niche delivery firms welcoming the news. Many companies would view the Postal Service’s exit from Saturday delivery as a business opportunity. Once established, competitors will demand a “level playing field” and ask Congress to open the nation’s mailboxes to their services, making it impossible to enforce the monopoly and maintain affordable universal service.
4. It would set a bad precedent. If the language requiring six-day delivery were repealed, there would be no legal barrier to prevent the Postal Service from reducing delivery days further, from 5-day to 4- or 3-day delivery. Indeed, Business Week magazine called on the Postal Service to shift immediately to 3-day delivery within days of the Postal Service’s announcement of its action plan. That would not only destroy half our jobs, but also likely lead to a death spiral for the Postal Service—less service leading to less mail volume leading to less service, and so on.
. It’s not necessary. The Postal Service has hidden financial strengths, with fully funded pension plans and, if the accounting is done properly, fully funded retiree health benefits. If we can convince Congress and the administration to fairly allocate pension costs and correct the $75 billion error made by the OPM when it established our retiree health fund, eliminating Saturday delivery would not be necessary. Postmaster General Jack Potter acknowledged as much at a March 18 hearing before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee. “If that [recovering the $75 billion and applying it to future retiree health care] were to happen,” he said, “we wouldn’t have to go to six-, to five-day delivery.”
- IMPORTANT NOTE: The NALC's proposal will not threaten anyone's retiree health benefits. The law mandates the provision of these benefits even if the Postal Service's retiree health fund had no assets. The retiree health fund is designed to make sure that postage ratepayers reimburse the U.S. Treasury for future health benefits. But USPS is being massively overcharged for these costs and there are excess postal pension assets in the civil service retirement fund that should be used to cover retiree health costs in the future. The reforms we support will save the Postal Service billions and protect every postal employees' retiree health benefits.
The latest news on NALC's fight to save the Postal Service
Letters from grandma, pharmacy deliveries The North Dakota Newspaper Association has launched an information campaign about the threat to six-day delivery. "Expecting a letter from Grandma [or] medicine from the pharmacy?" asks a flyer. "Don't expect it in Saturday's mail—that is, if the Postal Service has its way and discontinues delivery of the mail on Saturdays." The flyer discusses the misguided plan's implications and calls on customers to contact senators with messages of support. Click here to see a PDF of the flyer.
Cutting service would hurt global, local businesses In Sacramento, the Postal Regulatory Commission heard from global and small business owners and others who rely on six-day mail delivery. Sharif Sleiman of eBay said USPS handles about 80 percent of his company's packages, generating about $1.7 billion in Postal Service revenue. Six-day delivery is one factor that makes USPS so attractive to eBay sellers, he said. Click to read coverage in The Sacramento Bee, Capital Public Radio and Sacramento's CBS13. There were seven total public hearings on the proposed delivery-day cut scheduled.
"We are a service" In Las Vegas, the Postal Regulatory Commission held the first of its seven national public hearings on the Postal Service's penny-wise and pound-foolish proposal to slash service by dropping a day of mail delivery. "Destroying good jobs by cutting Saturday delivery at a time when we have a job crisis makes no sense," Nevada State Association of Letter Carriers Vice President Rich Griffin testified. Click the links to read more hearing coverage in the Las Vegas Sun and the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
More than just mail delivery The Postal Regulatory Commission also plans to look more closely at the overall social value of the USPS. Among its evaluation topics are the community and public safety impacts of letter carriers. Click here for the write-up on DMNews.com.
Taking our time, getting it right The Postal Service has ’criticized the PRCs decision to leave open until October 12 its docket on the question of dropping a day of delivery, but a blogger argues that the timeframe is necessary. The Rag Content blog gets it: "The Postal Service ... cannot rush this process or [condemn] the Commission for taking its time in listening to all parties. Due diligence is needed." Click here to read more.
"Do not mail" registry rejected On Monday, the Spokane, Washington city council rejected 6-to-1 a non-binding resolution asking the state legislature to create a registry that would allow people to decline bulk mail. Carriers argued the idea would hurt the already struggling Postal Service as well as businesses that depend on mail marketing. "We’re talking about a lot of jobs, not just postal service, but also in the private sector," Spokane Branch 442 President Martin Mueller told the council. Read more online in the Spin Control blog of the Spokane Spokesman-Review.
GAO report attacks postal labor, stiffs Congress The Government Accountability Office issued its report on potential changes in the Postal Service’s business model. President Rolando expressed the union’s deep disappointment in the report’s failure to deliver what Congress asked for, criticizing the GAO for instead producing “a full-throated attack on collective bargaining.” The full statement is here.
Only Congress can authorize a service cutback President Rolando says USPS's "reckless drive to end Saturday delivery...distracts us from the real solution, eliminating the crushing burden of a deeply flawed health benefits pre-funding policy. Their website and public relations campaign appear designed to fool mailers and the American people that 5-day delivery is a done deal." Click here to read the statement.
Pulling USPS out of the red On Federal News Radio's "Your Turn," NALC President Fred Rolando explained how the USPS plan to get rid of Saturday delivery would not address the real problems the Service faces—that doing so would simply make the USPS less attractive to those who want to send something during the weekend, and it would eliminate future revenue generation. Click here to read more and to listen to the interview with FNR senior correspondent Mike Causey.
The plan is already backfiring In Maryland, the Economist magazine plans to experiment with private delivery this summer in anticipation of a possible end to Saturday mail delivery. A plastic wrapper on magazines delivered this week in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., explains the test to subscribers—and provides a clear, tangible demonstration of how the USPS plan to cut Saturday delivery is backfiring—it is pushing business out of the Postal Service.
The Postal Service's inspector general speaks up "The Postal Service has been overcharged $75 billion for its pension obligations. Fixing these overcharges will allow the Postal Service to address its real challenges and implement its plan at a safer pace. The Postal Service and its employees deserve justice in this matter and the ability to fix the real problems." Click here to read Postal Service Inspector General David Williams' editorial in the Federal Times.
Congress questions USPS's 'worst-case scenario' A House subcommittee grilled Postmaster General Potter Thursday, April 15, about his plan to drop Saturday delivery as one way to head off a projected $238 billion loss over the next 10 years—a dollar amount he admitted in his testimony represented a "theoretical" worst-case scenario. One lawmaker, Gerry Connolly (D-VA), expressed skepticism about the reliability of the projected loss, calling it "fake" and "smoke and mirrors." Read NALC's recap here. Read testimony coverage from Reuters here.
Providing immense, irreplaceable public service "The Postal Service's economic turbulence has fostered the fantasy that it is no longer necessary in an age when 'warp-speed Internet' is constantly juxtaposed against 'snail mail.' [W]e must recognize that the Postal Service can and must remain public if we are to maintain the essential infrastructures of democracy." Click here to read more from The Nation's John Nichols.
NNA continues support for six-day mail delivery National Newspaper Association Postal Chairman Max Heath says the Postal Service has underestimated the public’s concern about a change in the number of delivery days. "This change will affect the delivery of medicines, home movies and timely bill payments," Heath said. "[It] is more of a high stakes gamble, with a lower payoff, than experts can see so far.” Click here to read more, including a statement from NNA President Cheryl Kaechele.
Is Congress biting the mailman? "It is distressing to see that Congress is apparently willing to go along with financially squeezing the Postal Service, causing tens of thousands of postal workers to lose their jobs and ending Saturday mail delivery." Click here to read more from Talking Points Memo's Dean Baker.
Five-day service faces resistance in House "While I understand the seriousness of the Postal Service's fiscal issues, I remain supportive of a six-day delivery schedule," House Financial Services Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., whose panel controls the small appropriations bill that mandates six-day delivery, said in an article that appears on NationalJournal.com. "I will be in conversations in coming weeks with the senior postal leadership and the postal unions in an effort to avoid service cuts."
PRC Chairman: Five-day delivery is "not a done deal" Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman Ruth Goldway cut through the Postal Service's media blitz by clarifying that the decision to cut a day of service cannot happen until after her panel issues its opinion. "It's not a done deal by any means," she said. The PRC plans to hold meetings across the country with everyday customers before consulting with lawmakers on an ultimate decision. Read about it on The Washington Post's Federal Eye blog.
President Rolando advances to Congress the union's stance on postal finances, six-day delivery NALC President Fredric V. Rolando delivered a statement to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Federal Service and General Government in response to the Postal Service's seven-point "Envisioning America's Future Postal Service."
Cutting Saturday mail self-defeating? "This is a country that increasingly demands speed; you'd think that someone, if only in an effort not to fall further behind, would be suggesting a seventh day of delivery be added. " Read more from CNN contributor Bob Greene here.
Postal Service cutbacks could hurt Netflix’s bottom line Dropping Saturday delivery would be a serious blow to the DVD rental service's finely tuned business model. Click here to read an article by The Big Money's Ethan Epstein.
No actual need to cut service Postmaster General Jack Potter told Congress March 18 that recovering the $75 billion USPS has been overcharged for the Civil Service pension fund could essentially solve the Postal Service’s financial crisis, eliminating the need for draconian measures like cutting delivery days.
Here is Potter’s key exchange with Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing March 18:
- Sen. Durbin: The Inspector General says you have overpaid $75 billion into the Civil Service Retirement System. If this is accurate, could you use this as a source for retiree health benefits and some of the other economic issues you’re facing?
PMG Potter: Yes, sir. Sen. Durbin: ...Are you trying to recover the $75 billion? PMG Potter: ...We are working and have appealed to OPM and OMB to re-open this very matter. If it were to happen, it would literally, I think, we would be almost fully funded on our retiree health benefits trust fund.... It would take a lot of pressure off. If that were to happen we wouldn’t have to go to six-, to five-day delivery. Sen. Durbin: ...You’re saying that if the $75 billion is found you wouldn’t have to cut the frequency of service? PMG Potter: Right.
- Click here to watch the entire video on c-span.org (link opens a new browser window or tab). The exchange above begins around the 49:30 mark.
- H.RES.173
Title: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service. Sponsor: Rep Graves, Sam [MO-6] (introduced 2/13/2009) Cosponsors (180) Latest Major Action: 2/13/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
COSPONSORS(180), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
|
Rep Ackerman, Gary L. [NY-5] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Adler, John H. [NJ-3] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep Altmire, Jason [PA-4] - 5/6/2010
|
Rep Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1] - 3/17/2010
|
|
Rep Arcuri, Michael A. [NY-24] - 3/4/2010
|
Rep Baca, Joe [CA-43] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] - 5/6/2010
|
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Berman, Howard L. [CA-28] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [GA-2] - 3/15/2010
|
|
Rep Bishop, Timothy H. [NY-1] - 4/22/2010
|
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 4/21/2010
|
|
Rep Boccieri, John A. [OH-16] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Boozman, John [AR-3] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Bordallo, Madeleine Z. [GU] - 3/12/2010
|
Rep Boren, Dan [OK-2] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Brady, Robert A. [PA-1] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Braley, Bruce L. [IA-1] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] - 3/9/2009
|
|
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Capps, Lois [CA-23] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Cardoza, Dennis A. [CA-18] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Carney, Christopher P. [PA-10] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Chandler, Ben [KY-6] - 4/29/2010
|
|
Rep Childers, Travis [MS-1] - 4/26/2010
|
Rep Chu, Judy [CA-32] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. [NY-11] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Cohen, Steve [TN-9] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Connolly, Gerald E. "Gerry" [VA-11] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Costello, Jerry F. [IL-12] - 5/4/2010
|
|
Rep Courtney, Joe [CT-2] - 4/20/2010
|
Rep Cummings, Elijah E. [MD-7] - 4/22/2010
|
|
Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Davis, Susan A. [CA-53] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. [CT-3] - 4/20/2010
|
Rep Doggett, Lloyd [TX-25] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Doyle, Michael F. [PA-14] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Driehaus, Steve [OH-1] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep Ellison, Keith [MN-5] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Ellsworth, Brad [IN-8] - 4/21/2010
|
|
Rep Emerson, Jo Ann [MO-8] - 3/24/2010
|
Rep Eshoo, Anna G. [CA-14] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 3/4/2010
|
Rep Foster, Bill [IL-14] - 4/21/2010
|
|
Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4] - 3/10/2010
|
Rep Frelinghuysen, Rodney P. [NJ-11] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Garamendi, John [CA-10] - 3/25/2010
|
Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 5/6/2010
|
|
Rep Grayson, Alan [FL-8] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Green, Al [TX-9] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Green, Gene [TX-29] - 5/12/2010
|
Rep Guthrie, Brett [KY-2] - 3/10/2010
|
|
Rep Hall, John J. [NY-19] - 3/25/2010
|
Rep Hall, Ralph M. [TX-4] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Halvorson, Deborah L. [IL-11] - 4/21/2010
|
Rep Hare, Phil [IL-17] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Harman, Jane [CA-36] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Heinrich, Martin [NM-1] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie [SD] - 5/5/2010
|
Rep Higgins, Brian [NY-27] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Hill, Baron P. [IN-9] - 3/22/2010
|
Rep Himes, James A. [CT-4] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [NY-22] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Hinojosa, Ruben [TX-15] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Hirono, Mazie K. [HI-2] - 5/11/2010
|
Rep Hodes, Paul W. [NH-2] - 3/9/2010
|
|
Rep Holden, Tim [PA-17] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 5/13/2010
|
Rep Jackson Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Jenkins, Lynn [KS-2] - 3/10/2010
|
Rep Kanjorski, Paul E. [PA-11] - 5/6/2010
|
|
Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9] - 4/20/2010
|
Rep Kennedy, Patrick J. [RI-1] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Kildee, Dale E. [MI-5] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Kilroy, Mary Jo [OH-15] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep King, Peter T. [NY-3] - 4/20/2010
|
Rep Lance, Leonard [NJ-7] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Langevin, James R. [RI-2] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Larsen, Rick [WA-2] - 4/20/2010
|
|
Rep Larson, John B. [CT-1] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Latham, Tom [IA-4] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep LaTourette, Steven C. [OH-14] - 3/22/2010
|
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep LoBiondo, Frank A. [NJ-2] - 3/24/2010
|
Rep Loebsack, David [IA-2] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16] - 2/13/2009
|
Rep Lowey, Nita M. [NY-18] - 4/22/2010
|
|
Rep Lucas, Frank D. [OK-3] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Luetkemeyer, Blaine [MO-9] - 2/4/2010
|
|
Rep Maffei, Daniel B. [NY-25] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. [NY-14] - 4/22/2010
|
|
Rep Massa, Eric J. J. [NY-29] - 3/5/2009
|
Rep McCarthy, Carolyn [NY-4] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep McCollum, Betty [MN-4] - 4/26/2010
|
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 4/20/2010
|
|
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3] - 4/21/2010
|
Rep McIntyre, Mike [NC-7] - 5/6/2010
|
|
Rep McMahon, Michael E. [NY-13] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep McNerney, Jerry [CA-11] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Meek, Kendrick B. [FL-17] - 5/6/2010
|
Rep Meeks, Gregory W. [NY-6] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Melancon, Charlie [LA-3] - 4/26/2010
|
Rep Michaud, Michael H. [ME-2] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Moore, Gwen [WI-4] - 5/13/2010
|
Rep Moran, Jerry [KS-1] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep Murphy, Patrick J. [PA-8] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Murphy, Scott [NY-20] - 5/4/2010
|
|
Rep Murphy, Tim [PA-18] - 5/11/2010
|
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. [CA-38] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Neal, Richard E. [MA-2] - 4/29/2010
|
|
Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. [TX-27] - 5/18/2010
|
Rep Owens, William L. [NY-23] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Pallone, Frank, Jr. [NJ-6] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-8] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep Pastor, Ed [AZ-4] - 3/18/2010
|
Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] - 3/12/2010
|
|
Rep Perlmutter, Ed [CO-7] - 5/13/2010
|
Rep Peters, Gary C. [MI-9] - 5/4/2010
|
|
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 5/6/2010
|
Rep Pingree, Chellie [ME-1] - 2/25/2009
|
|
Rep Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] - 5/19/2010
|
Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND] - 4/22/2010
|
|
Rep Rahall, Nick J., II [WV-3] - 2/13/2009
|
Rep Rehberg, Denny [MT] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Richardson, Laura [CA-37] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Rodriguez, Ciro D. [TX-23] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Roe, David P. [TN-1] - 3/25/2010
|
Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Ross, Mike [AR-4] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille [CA-34] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch [MD-2] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Ryan, Tim [OH-17] - 3/18/2010
|
Rep Salazar, John T. [CO-3] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Sanchez, Loretta [CA-47] - 3/24/2010
|
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Schauer, Mark H. [MI-7] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 3/24/2010
|
|
Rep Schock, Aaron [IL-18] - 5/5/2010
|
Rep Schrader, Kurt [OR-5] - 4/22/2010
|
|
Rep Sestak, Joe [PA-7] - 3/9/2010
|
Rep Shea-Porter, Carol [NH-1] - 3/10/2010
|
|
Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27] - 5/19/2010
|
Rep Shuler, Heath [NC-11] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Sires, Albio [NJ-13] - 3/11/2010
|
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [NY-28] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4] - 2/13/2009
|
Rep Space, Zachary T. [OH-18] - 4/29/2010
|
|
Rep Speier, Jackie [CA-12] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Spratt, John M., Jr. [SC-5] - 5/18/2010
|
|
Rep Sutton, Betty [OH-13] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Teague, Harry [NM-2] - 3/25/2010
|
|
Rep Terry, Lee [NE-2] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Thompson, Glenn [PA-5] - 5/13/2010
|
|
Rep Tierney, John F. [MA-6] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Titus, Dina [NV-3] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Tonko, Paul [NY-21] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 4/26/2010
|
|
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12] - 5/11/2010
|
Rep Visclosky, Peter J. [IN-1] - 5/11/2010
|
|
Rep Walz, Timothy J. [MN-1] - 5/11/2010
|
Rep Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [FL-20] - 4/29/2010
|
|
Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35] - 4/13/2010
|
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] - 4/20/2010
|
|
Rep Welch, Peter [VT] - 4/29/2010
|
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] - 4/13/2010
|
|
Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1] - 4/21/2010
|
Rep Wilson, Charles A. [OH-6] - 3/18/2010
|
|
Rep Wittman, Robert J. [VA-1] - 4/15/2010
|
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Wu, David [OR-1] - 5/4/2010
|
Rep Yarmuth, John A. [KY-3] - 4/15/2010
|
|
Rep Young, C.W. Bill [FL-10] - 2/25/2009
|
Rep Young, Don [AK] - 3/18/2010
|
THOMAS Home | Contact | Accessibility | Legal | FirstGov
Gimme 5' contributor has shot at Final Four
Trip, TV top prizes in Anaheim convention raffle
|
|
How to contribute to COLCPE
|
|
|
NALC's political action fund helps elect friends of letter carriers (for NALC members only)
|
|
|
Active members can contribute directly from their paychecks via PostalEASE. Phone instructions | Online instructions
|
|
|
Active and retired members can contribute automatically from their bank account via Electronic Fund Transfer. Instructions
|
|
|
Retired members can contribute directly from their OPM annuities. Instructions
|
Two raffles will be held at this summer’s national convention in Anaheim as a way of saying thanks to the men and women of the NALC who give every pay period to the non-partisan Committee on Letter Carrier Political Education.
The top prize is a trip for two to the 2011 NCAA Final Four, a getaway that includes a pair of tickets to the Final Four and national championship, airfare, a three-night hotel stay and a per diem for expenses.
To be eligible to win the trip, active and retired letter carriers must be a “Gimme 5 for COLCPE” contributor. For active carriers, that means automatically contributing $5 per pay period by electronic funds transfer (EFT) or by using one of their three payroll allotments. For retirees, “Gimme 5” is $5 per month directly from their annuity payments or by EFT. For both active and retiree members, NALC Headquarters must receive your “Gimme 5" automatic contribution by June 30. Last-chance sign-ups will be accepted at the Legislative Department’s booth at the Convention Center.
Additionally, “lump sum” donors who do not give automatically will be eligible to win a 42-inch flat-panel high-definition television. These donors are active carriers who have contributed at least $120 between January 1 and June 30, or retirees who have given $60 in that same time period. A donation that helps a member reach those benchmarks will be also be accepted at the Legislative Department’s convention booth, allowing the member to qualify for the raffle.
“The real benefit we all get from COLCPE is job security, thanks to electing and keeping our friends in Congress” said NALC President Fred Rolando. “But this is a fun way for us to recognize and show that we appreciate each member’s contribution.”
- The Committee on Letter Carrier Political Education, or COLCPE, is NALC’s political action committee. Funds are used to support candidates—Republicans, Democrats and independents—who support letter carriers’ issues, and to help finance get-out-the-vote and other political activities. Absolutely no union dues money is used to support political candidates.
- Contributions to COLCPE are entirely voluntary. Tens of thousands of active and retired NALC members choose to give each year, many through regular deductions from their paychecks or monthly annuity payments, or by electronic funds transfer from their checking accounts.
“Gimme 5 for COLCPE” was launched in March 2006 with the aim of increasing the number of automatic contributors. The target of $5 per pay period represents just 50 cents per work day. The goal for retiree contributions is $5 each month. (Of course, any amount is welcome.)
A steady stream of contributions is important for planning by the union's Legislative and Political Affairs Department, as well as for budgeting resources.
Louisiana State Association partcipated in a lobbying trip in Washington, DC organized by California State President -John Beaumont, March 8-13, 2009. There were five Regions participating in the Lobbying trip.Regions 1,2,4,8, and first timers 10(Texas). We were trained on Monday, March 9, by the National Staff. We hit the ground running on Tuesday speaking to our Congressmans on the Bill H.R.22. Below are a few pictures from the congressional breakfast held on Thursday.
     
 
|